Yes. Now the test part of the for
will look for the sentinel.
In a sentinel controlled
loop the change part depends on data from the user.
It is awkward to do this inside a for
statement.
So the change part is omitted from the for
statement
and put in a convenient location.
Here is an example.
The program keeps asking the user for x and
printing the square root of x.
The program ends when the user enters a negative number.
import java.util.Scanner; class evalSqrt { public static void main (String[] args ) throws IOException { Scanner scan = new Scanner(); double x; System.out.print("Enter a value for x or -1 to exit: ") ; x = scan.nextDouble(); for ( ; x >= 0.0 ; ) { System.out.println( "Square root of " + x + " is " + Math.sqrt( x ) ); System.out.print("Enter a value for x or -1 to exit: ") ; x = scan.nextDouble(); } } }
This program would be better if a while
statement
were used in place of the for
statement.
Do you think that the test part of a for
can be omitted?