I think this would be a useful exercise, and eventually it could
be the basis for additional deliverables (the EXPRESS model itself
along with APIs supporting the model). However, I'd hate to
substantially slow progress on defining a command language
(which I believe is more readily adopted). If we could do this
in parallel, possibly through a sub-group, it'd be great.
> - Will there also be a format/method also for implement the constraint
> data/rules data population within an EDA tool, such as an API
> (e.g. C++)?
I think this would be useful eventually. One nearer-term approach
would be to not only supply a golden parser (lexer and yacc grammar)
for a command language, but also an implementation of the parser which
creates data structures. This is a lot more work, which I can attest
to based on doing it for GCF.
> > 3. Constraint dictionary discussion
> > We postponed this to the next meeting.
>
> Can someone point me at a working document on this area? I haven't been
> able to read all the DC-WG email and seemed to missed discussion on
> this.
See http://vhdl.org/dcwg/hm/0005.html and follow the links at
the bottom under "Attachments".
Mark
-- Mark Hahn phone: (408) 428-5399 Architect, Deep Submicron Business Unit fax: (408) 428-5959 Cadence Design Systems email: mhahn@cadence.com