Attendees:
  Mark Hahn, Cadence (Chair)
  Bob Dilly, IBM
  Vikas Sharma, IBM
  Jim Swift, IBM
New action items:
      Who         When     What
      ----------  ------   --------
 1.   Bob         5/18     Get authorization to use the IBM logo
 2.   Mark        5/18     Send Bob the GCF 2.0 spec
Open action items:
      Who         When     What
      ----------  ------   --------
 1.   Bob         4/20     Determine whether an NDA is required for the
                  -> 4/27  library data
                  -> 5/11
                  -> 5/18
 2.   Mark        3/2      Add operating conditions to the taxonomy
                  -> 3/30
                  -> 4/13
                  -> 5/4
                  -> 5/25
 3.   Mark        5/4      Work with Jeff and Ed to come up with
                  -> 5/11  the golden DCDL script for the demo
                  -> 5/18
Closed action items:
      Who         When     What
      ----------  ------   --------
 1.   Vikas       5/11     Send a description of the Einstimer cmds
                           for operating conditions
 2.   Mark        5/11     Close on whether it is possible for Cadence
                           to make their TCL functions available as a
                           starting point
 3.   Mark        4/20     Close on DAC demo participation from
                  -> 5/4   Synplicity, Altera
                  -> 5/11
Next Meeting:
  The next meeting will be a teleconference on 5/11
  from 9-11 am (PDT).
Details:
  1. Review action items
     No progress on closing on the
     proceeding with the assumption that no NDA is required.
  2. Discuss operating conditions
     We talked about issues with selecting the process point for
     analysis.  Some tools/libraries use a string to identify the
     process point, while others use a floating point number.  We
     need to decide which approach to support (or both), and how
     to map between them.
     We also discussed identifying multiple operating conditions
     up front, then selecting which ones would be used for analysis.
     Mark promised to send Bob an early version of the GCF 2.0 draft,
     which covers these issues in gory detail.
  3. Discuss typical values
     We only talked briefly about this, because Mark wasn't able
     to send out the proposal far enough in advance of the meeting
     for people to review it.
  4. Discuss the DAC demo
     Synplicity and Actel have decided not to participate in the
     demo.
     We discussed the flow for the demo.  There will be two flows,
     one ASIC and one FPGA.  The ASIC flow will be based on BuildGates,
     Pearl, Einstimer, Silicon Ensemble, and probably Velocity.
     The FPGA flow will be based on Leonardo Spectrum, an FPGA
     place & route tool (probably Xilinx), and Velocity.
     Vikas will send a diagram for the flow IBM envisioned for
     Einstimer, and Mark will work on the overall flow diagrams
     and message.  We tentatively agreed that Einstimer would be
     run at the pre-layout analysis stage (immediately prior to
     handoff).
     Bob pointed out that IBM requires approval for using the IBM
     logo; he will follow up on getting the approval.
     We talked about the logistics of staging and running the demo.
     This is particularly important for the ASIC flow, because tools
     from several companies will be involved (for the FPGA flow,
     Mentor will be coordinating things).  One approach is for
     everyone to be familiar with the entire demo, so that we can
     alternate presentation times.  This requires training and
     staging all of the software in advance.  Another (less desirable)
     approach is to have each company present their portion of the flow.
Thanks,
Mark
-- Mark Hahn phone: (408) 428-5399 Senior Architect fax: (408) 428-5959 Cadence Design Systems email: mhahn@cadence.com