Re: [$ieee-1850] IEEE 1850 PSL LRM draft 5....

>
> harry,
>
>> Also, I would appreciate a good review of Annex A, the BNF.  I'm
>> worried about its accuracy.
>
> the definition of PSL_Identifier seems to be missing.  (i can't take 
> credit
> for being so observant:  i happened to be going over some old emails 
> and
> found such a comment from klaus from quite some time ago - it seems 
> that it
> still has not been addressed.)
>
> cindy.
>

Yes--very good.   This problem is not limited to Annex A, but occurs 
all over the
informal semantics, wherever PSL_Identifier occurs.

Can someone give me a proposal I can edit in throughout the text?

Thanks

-Harry