VHDL Issue Number:        2115

Language_Version          VHDL-2002
Classification            LRM Terminology, Grammar and Typographical Errors
Summary                   Binding specification should be binding indication
Relevant_LRM_Sections     10.3 Visibility
    Annex B Glossary
Related_Issues            
Key_Words_and_Phrases     
Authors_Name              James Unterburger
Authors_Phone_Number      503-685-0860
Authors_Fax_Number        
Authors_Email_Address     jamesu@model.com
Authors_Affiliation       Mentor Graphics
Authors_Address1          8005 SW Boeckman Rd.
Authors_Address2          Wilsonville, OR 97070
Authors_Address3          

Current Status:           VASG-Approved

Superseded By:

------------------------
Date Submitted:           16 May 2007
Date Analyzed:            20 June 2007
Author of Analysis:       Chuck Swart
Revision Number:          2
Date Last Revised:        18 October 2007

Description of Problem
----------------------

The term "binding specification" appears twice in the LRM.  The
correct wording should be "binding indication".

The locations are 10.3, item l (ell) in the list, and B.126 ("imply")
in the glossary.
    
These are duplicated in the proposed 200X LRM (D3.0) at 10.3 item m
(em) in the list, and B.179 ("imply") in the glossary.

Proposed Resolution
-------------------

Change "binding specification" to "binding indication" at the two
places.  And fix the 200X proposed LRM as well.

VASG-ISAC Analysis & Rationale
------------------------------

The submitter is correct.

VASG-ISAC Recommendation for IEEE Std 1076-2002
-----------------------------------------------

Interpret the standard as if the Recommendation for Future Revisions
were in effect.

VASG-ISAC Recommendation for Future Revisions
---------------------------------------------

Change the two references to "binding specification" to "binding
indication".