RE: Call for electronic vote on IR2000

From: Peter Ashenden <peter@ashenden.com.au>
Date: Tue Nov 09 2004 - 15:20:55 PST

Ajay,

> A small point - shouldn't the recommendation for future revisions be:
>
> "It is an error if a deferred constant declaration appears
> anywhere other than in a package declaration."
>
> Note that the "anywhere" is missing in the current version.

I think the grammar is correct as proposed. You could construct a sentence
of the form:

  ... if it appears in a given place ...

or in a form denoting the complementary condition:

  ... if it appears other than in a given place ...

The usage is whether something appears or otherwise. I don't think you need
to qualify the verb.

But then again, that could just be archaic usage. What do others think?

Cheers,

PA

--
Dr. Peter J. Ashenden                        peter@ashenden.com.au
Ashenden Designs Pty. Ltd.                   www.ashenden.com.au
PO Box 640                                   Ph:  +61 8 8339 7532
Stirling, SA 5152                            Fax: +61 8 8339 2616
Australia                                    Mobile: +61 414 70 9106
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-isac@eda.org [mailto:owner-isac@eda.org] On 
> Behalf Of Ajayharsh Varikat
> Sent: Tuesday, 9 November 2004 21:55
> To: cswart@model.com; isac@eda.org
> Subject: Re: Call for electronic vote on IR2000
> 
> 
> 
Received on Tue Nov 9 15:20:55 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 09 2004 - 15:20:56 PST