Re: results of ISAC meeting

The ISAC has approved 20 IRs in the past few months.
I was assuming that all of these (if approved by the VASG) would be
incorporated
into the next revision.
If this is not true, then do you want us to prioritize them?

There are about 20 open IRs which we are still considering.
they range the gamut from trivial spelling errors to significant issues.
Our goal is to
complete work on most of them within the next month or so.

Chuck Swart

Bailey, Stephen wrote:

>Chuck,
>
>We need to define a cut-off for ISAC results to be incorporated in the
>next revision. Let me know if there are any IRs which ISAC would really
>like to make the next revision. I think the cut-off should be in the
>next month or so.
>
>-Steve
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Swart, Chuck
>>Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 3:31 PM
>>To: Bailey, Stephen
>>Subject: results of ISAC meeting
>>
>>Steve,
>>At the recent meeting, the ISAC voted on two IRs:
>>
>>2025 Forwarded "Generate" for sequential code
>>
>>2044 ISAC-Approved Deprecation of linkage ports
>>affects boundary scan description language
>>
>>
>>IR 2025 should be forwarded to the VHDL-200x FT group for
>>consideration related to encryption requirements.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Mon Jan 24 14:47:07 2005