Question on IR2058

Folks,

The proposed wording for identifying declarations to be made potentially
visible along with a used type or subtype is:

    b) The implicitly declared operations, enumeration literals (for
       enumeration types), physical units (for physical types) and
       subprograms appropriate for the type, or any subprograms or
       operators that are explicitly declared immediately within the
       same declarative region as the type and that hide an implicitly
       declared subprogram or operator.

I think "subprograms appropriate for the type" is a hang-over from when we
were considering including all subprograms with the type in their
signatures.  Is that right?  If so, we should delete it.  If not, what does
it refer to?

Thanks.

Cheers,

PA

--
Dr. Peter J. Ashenden                        peter@ashenden.com.au
Ashenden Designs Pty. Ltd.                   www.ashenden.com.au
PO Box 640                                   Ph:  +61 8 8339 7532
Stirling, SA 5152                            Fax: +61 8 8339 2616
Australia                                    Mobile: +61 414 70 9106