ISAC: Minutes of meeting help 06 April 2005

From: Chuck Swart <cswart_at_.....>
Date: Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:21:45 PDT
I'm attaching the minutes. They are also available on the website.

Chuck



Minutes of ISAC meeting held via telecom on 
06 April 2005

Present: Peter Ashenden, Chuck Swart, Ajay Verikat

Absent: Jim Lewis, Deepak Pant, Larry Soule

Next Meeting: Thursday May 05 2005, 8 pm Pacific Daylight Time
             (Friday May 06 2005, 3 am GMT)

TOPIC: IR 2064 Type conversion of unconstrained output in a port map

It was decided that no LRM change is needed. It was suggested that
Larry change his analysis to drop the rewording, but to refer to the
specific LRM interpretation of "must".

ACTION: Larry to update.

TOPIC: IR2065 OTHERS in aggregates

Chuck to investigate feasibility of relaxing constraints on others
in aggregates.

ACTION: Chuck to analyze.

TOPIC: IR2066 Multidimensional array in IEEE Std 1076.6-2004

ACTION: Chuck to forward to 1076.2

TOPIC: IR2067 Enhancement: Logical link interface abstraction

ACTION: Chuck to forward to DTA.

TOPIC: IR2028 Clarify simulation cycle.

This is ready for ballot.

ACTION: All to vote on.

TOPIC: IR2050 Definition of S'Last_Value was apparently broken in 1993

This is ready for ballot.

ACTION: All to vote on.

TOPIC: IR2058 Does USE of type name make operators and literals visible?

This is ready for ballot.

ACTION: All to vote on.

TOPIC: IR2062 Range staticness

Ajay want to incorporate suggestions from Peter.

ACTION: Ajay to update.

TOPIC: IR2043 Numeric VALUE attribute parameter can't have sign 

Fast track FT5A might affect this, since it defines string
representation of values. So options include: a) Wait until FT5A is
voted on.  If it is approved use its features to resolve IR2043. If it
isn't approved, write up independent solution to IR2043.  b) Write up
two solutions to IR2043: One assuming FT5A, the other without
reference to FT5A.

ACTION: Deepak to decide whether to do analysis now or later.

TOPIC: IR2054 Individ. assoc. rules for array formal are not valid

We need to examine this in detail which we will do at next meeting.

ACTION: All to review Larry's analysis.

TOPIC: IR2038

The references aren't clear regarding which version they apply to.

ACTION: Chuck to revise, then Peter will do preliminary analysis.
Received on Thu Apr 7 13:21:48 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Apr 07 2005 - 13:21:49 PDT