These are the results of the VASG vote. We'll discuss them at the upcoming meeting. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Vote Results: Call for Vote on Additional Issues Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:31:45 -0800 From: Jim Lewis <jim@synthworks.com> To: Chuck Swart <cswart@model.com> CC: VHDL-200x <vhdl-200x@eda.org> References: <43AB670C.3030700@synthworks.com> Attached is the vote results > Dear colleagues, > > This is a call for vote from IEEE P1076 WG members on the next group of > ISAC issues listed below. The ISAC has analyzed the issues and made > recommendations for interpretation of the IEEE 1076-2002 standard and for > future revisions of the standard. This vote is for approval of the ISAC > recommendations. > > Please note that, in some cases, a recommendation may be to reject a > request. In that case, a vote to approve the recommendation means > rejecting > the request, whereas a negative vote means reconsidering the request. > Please > take care with the logical sense of your vote in such cases. > > Also note that some of the issues do not specify detailed LRM edits to > implement a change. The intention is that the detailed changes be > specified > in a Language Change Specification (LCS) document that will be voted on > separately. The intent of this vote is to determine whether such an LCS is > required. > > Only votes of eligible voters will be counted. Votes from ineligible > voters > will be recorded for information and for adding to your "last 2 or 3" > participation count. I will acknowledge each vote received and indicate > whether it was counted or not. > > Please forward votes to me by email (eg, by replying to this message) by > 5pm > US-PDT, Thursday 12 January, 2006. > > For each issue, would you please vote one of: approve, negative with > comments, negative with no comments, or abstain. You may also provide > informative comments with a vote to approve a recommendation. Please use > the form below. Thank you. > > Regards, > > Jim Lewis > P1076 Chair > > > > Issue Approve Negative Negative Abstain > with comment no comment > > 2028 Clarify simulation cycle. > http://www.eda.org/isac/IRs-VHDL-2002/IR2028.txt > 2028 ____ ____ ____ ____ > > Comment: > > > > 2043 Numeric VALUE attribute parameter can't have sign > http://www.eda.org/isac/IRs-VHDL-2002/IR2043.txt > 2043 ____ ____ ____ ____ > > Comment: > > > > 2050 Definition of S'Last_Value was apparently broken in 1993 > http://www.eda.org/isac/IRs-VHDL-2002/IR2050.txt > 2050 ____ ____ ____ ____ > > Comment: > > > > 2062 Range staticness > http://www.eda.org/isac/IRs-VHDL-2002/IR2062.txt > 2062 ____ ____ ____ ____ > > Comment: > > 2064 Type conversion of unconstrained output in a port map > http://www.eda.org/isac/IRs-VHDL-2002/IR2064.txt > 2064 ____ ____ ____ ____ > > Comment: > > 2065 OTHERS in aggregates too restrictive > http://www.eda.org/isac/IRs-VHDL-2002/IR2065.txt > 2065 ____ ____ ____ ____ > > Comment: > 2068 Entity instantiation with space before the entity name > http://www.eda.org/isac/IRs-VHDL-2002/IR2068.txt > 2068 ____ ____ ____ ____ > > Comment: > > > 2069 Visibility of generics in block configurations > http://www.eda.org/isac/IRs-VHDL-2002/IR2069.txt > 2069 ____ ____ ____ ____ > > Comment: > > > 2071 Indexed name in case expression > http://www.eda.org/isac/IRs-VHDL-2002/IR2071.txt > 2071 ____ ____ ____ ____ > > Comment: > > > > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jim Lewis Director of Training mailto:Jim@SynthWorks.com SynthWorks Design Inc. http://www.SynthWorks.com 1-503-590-4787 Expert VHDL Training for Hardware Design and Verification ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 01 2006 - 15:19:59 PST