I'm passing this on to the ISAC for information. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: RE: IR 2091 Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 12:02:25 -0700 From: "Jarek Kaczynski" <jarek@aldec.com> To: "Chuck Swart" <cswart@model.com> Chuck, I have talked to David - his request is based on the status of the tools around May 2005. Whatever was happening in the tools at that time is gone, so I have to concur with the suggested resolution not to change anything in the standard. Plus, the rewording of the appropriate clauses of the 2006 standard triggered by the LCS-2006-113 should make the situation more clear anyway. Thanks, Jerry Kaczynski -----Original Message----- From: Chuck Swart [mailto:cswart@model.com] Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 10:31 AM To: Jarek Kaczynski Subject: Re: IR 2091 Why don't you contact him directly? That way you can get more details about how he's using your tool. I would just be a middle-man. Chuck Swart Jarek Kaczynski wrote: >Chuck, > >I have tried the code (with all the neccessary padding) and there are >no warnings/errors reported -- neither during elaboration nor during >execution. For the peace of mind I have tried flipping the >compatibility switches, but the result was always the same. >Do you have more detailed data regarding David's report or should I >contact him directly? > >Thanks, > >Jerry Kaczynski > >-----Original Message----- >From: Chuck Swart [mailto:cswart@model.com] >Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 11:23 PM >To: Jarek Kaczynski >Subject: IR 2091 > >Jerry, >I am attaching IR 2091for your review. >Dave Bishop claims that Aldec some of these type conversions, which >Peter has concluded are legal. > >So you are invited to respond to this analysis. >The ISAC is about to vote on it, then it will be submitted to the VASG. >If you disagree with the conclusions it would be good to voice your >concerns early. > >Chuck Swart > > > >Received on Fri Apr 21 13:24:21 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 21 2006 - 13:24:23 PDT