LRM version D3.0 contains in Clause 10.4 Use clauses: "A potentially visible declaration is actually made directly visible except in the following three cases: ... b) A potentially visible explicit declaration is not made directly visible if the place considered is within the immediate scope of an explicitly declared homograph of the declaration." Isn't there a problem with this rule? Specifically, A label is implicitly declared and is a homograph of any other declaration with the same name. So, under the new wording, a use clause would make directly visible a potentially visible declaration with the same name as the label. Wouldn't this make the label no longer visible? Any ideas? Chuck Swart -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Fri Mar 16 17:43:09 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 16 2007 - 17:43:12 PDT