IR 1000 has been approved, with the editorial change of P1076-2007/D3.0 to P1076-2006/D3.0 IR 2111 has been approved. Jim Lewis voted "NO" on IR 2112 wit the comment: > I think this should be forwarded as a request for the next > revision. Different attributes on ports should be able to be > used for different architectures - such as FPGA flavor 1 vs > FPGA flavor 2. > > Going further, in the past VHDL-200X talked about synthesis > attributes being applied to processes and that putting these > in the architecture declaration was too far away from the source. > It would be convenient to attribute a process label within the > attribute declarative region. We'll take this up at the upcoming meeting this WEDNESDAY, note DAY CHANGE. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Mon Apr 30 17:27:29 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 30 2007 - 17:27:31 PDT