RE: [Fwd: Re: Some questions about newly submitted IR 2127]

Chuck,

I've just been looking through the IR in preparation for the meeting.
Farrell points out differences among tools over whether the potentially
visible declarations are made directly visible. However, it's not clear
where the use clauses are placed.  He says, "Now consider this function
being made directly visible in architecture, arch, by a use clause..." Does
this mean the use clause is within the architecture body, or in the context
clause of the architecture body? A sample model (sanitized if necessary)
would be helpful for us to consider this issue.

Cheers,

PA

--
Dr. Peter J. Ashenden         peter@ashenden.com.au
Ashenden Designs Pty. Ltd.    www.ashenden.com.au
PO Box 640                    VoIP: sip://0871270078@sip.internode.on.net
Stirling, SA 5152             Phone: +61 8 7127 0078
Australia                     Mobile: +61 414 70 9106
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-isac@server.eda.org 
> [mailto:owner-isac@server.eda.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Swart - MTI
> Sent: Thursday, 10 January 2008 07:28
> To: isac@server.eda.org
> Subject: [Fwd: Re: Some questions about newly submitted IR 2127]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.