Bugz 227 Glossary entry for expanded name has incorrect reference

From: Chuck Swart - MTI <cswart_at_.....>
Date: Thu Jun 19 2008 - 13:16:51 PDT
the VHDL-93 wording gives the following (partial) rule for producing the 
sensitivity set for a wait statement:
"For each primary in the condition of the condition clause, if the 
primary is
...
-- an expanded name whose prefix denotes a signal, add the longest 
static prefix of the name to the sensitivity set"

This phrase was inadvertently dropped from VHDL-2002 and is not 
accurate, because the prefix doesn't denote
a signal. I propose that the wording be changed to:

"-- an expanded name whose suffix denotes a signal, add the longest 
static prefix of the name to the sensitivity set"

This looks a little strange, but it seems to work in all cases.

Think about this for tonight's meeting.

Chuck Swart



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Jun 19 13:17:19 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jun 19 2008 - 13:17:23 PDT