IM05

Here are our comments on IM05

Point #1: We agree with the web site..

Point #2: We propose the following clarification be added to the
specification at the point that Per suggests

"Every cclock edge must occur on a uclock edge". All of the other
properties follow from this fact and this statement is clear and
concise.

Point #3: Making the suggested point at that location in the
specification takes away from the topic at that location which is
multiclock alignment. If there needs to be an example, it should be at
the point where uclock and clock relationships are being discussed.

Point #4: We agree with the web site.

Point #5: We agree with the web site.

Point #6: We agree with the web site.

Point #7: Withdrawn.

Duaine Pryor
Received on Wed Mar 24 11:58:57 2004