Hi Brian,
> Did you want to make this a formal proposal for the next
> version of the spec. If so, I will open an issue number for
> it, so that it
> doesn't get forgotten.
Did you see this from Russ (it was embedded in his first reply to my
IM33 email):
Russ> Changing subjects, after reading the spec some more, I found
Russ> what might be a
Russ> separate issue. The CycleStamp() accessor for
Russ> SceMiMessageData objects is
Russ> presented in the spec (p52, PDF 60) without any description
Russ> of what would
Russ> happen if a renegade user were to call it on a
Russ> SceMiMessageData object not
Russ> originating from an OutputPortProxy. Should the
Russ> accessor call
Russ> the port's
Russ> error handler in this case, return 0, or is "undefined
Russ> behavior" adequate?
This warrants its own IM, I think.
Per
-- Per Bojsen Email: <bojsen@zaiqtech.com> Zaiq Technologies, Inc. WWW: http://www.zaiqtech.com 78 Dragon Ct. Tel: 781 721 8229 Woburn, MA 01801 Fax: 781 932 7488Received on Mon Nov 8 06:24:24 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 08 2004 - 06:24:32 PST