Hi Russ, > Per, you didn't really summarize what I was trying to say correctly. > The "potential" for non-deterministic behavior was not what I said. Right, that was my interpretation or paraphrasing. > I think you'll agree that once the mechanism introduces *actual* > non-deterministic behavior, then the free-running use model may as > well be used? If by actual non-deterministic behavior you mean behavior that it is impossible for the user to constrain to become deterministic no matter what he does, then I would agree. But I don't see Shabtay's batching `knobs' being in this category except perhaps for the free-run switch (was it you or Shabtay that first introduced that?). Per -- Per Bojsen Email: <bojsen@zaiqtech.com> Zaiq Technologies, Inc. WWW: http://www.zaiqtech.com 78 Dragon Ct. Tel: 781 721 8229 Woburn, MA 01801 Fax: 781 932 7488Received on Wed Jun 22 12:44:12 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jun 22 2005 - 12:44:17 PDT