IM201

From: Per Bojsen <bojsen_at_.....>
Date: Wed Sep 28 2005 - 20:21:55 PDT

Hi Brian,

on IM201 you added:

  While we should only define a C interface we should leave open the
  C++ bindings for 1.1

I think this should be clarified to say that all new SCE-MI 2.0
features only get a C binding, but the old C++ binding for
SCE-MI 1.1 stays as it is by virtue of backwards compatibility.

Per

Received on Wed Sep 28 20:21:58 2005

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Per Bojsen: "IM200 (was Re: IM201)"
Previous message: Per Bojsen: "RE: Action Item: Draft proposal for prevention of SCE-MI 1.1 and SCE-MI 2.0 model mixing"
Next in thread: Per Bojsen: "IM200 (was Re: IM201)"
Reply: Per Bojsen: "IM200 (was Re: IM201)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Sep 28 2005 - 20:22:16 PDT