RE: IM202

From: Stickley, John <john_stickley_at_.....>
Date: Thu Sep 29 2005 - 05:54:55 PDT
Per,

That's precisely my point. Here we touch a bit into the
"modeling subset" realm in terms of saying what can be
inside an exported function. The point I'm making is
that to provide the very basic equivalent SCE-MI 1.1
message input/output port capability, we use exported
functions strictly with assignments and nothing more.

-- johnS

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-itc@eda.org on behalf of Per Bojsen
Sent: Thu 9/29/2005 8:34 AM
To: itc@eda.org
Subject: IM202
 
Hi Brian,

in your notes on IM202 you have a sentence that says:

  John claims that in 1.1 the only thing we allow in an export
  function is assignments.

Given that 1.1 does not have exported functions, I think you meant
to say something along the lines of:

  In SCE-MI 1.1 we only allowed the equivalent of assignments in
  exported functions.

John, does this capture what you were saying?  I think the point
you were making that if we decide to allow more in exported
functions/tasks we are providing new functionality compared to
SCE-MI 1.1, right?

Per

-- 
Per Bojsen                                Email: <bojsen@zaiqtech.com>
Zaiq Technologies, Inc.                   WWW:   http://www.zaiqtech.com
78 Dragon Ct.                             Tel:   781 721 8229
Woburn, MA 01801                          Fax:   781 932 7488
Received on Thu Sep 29 05:57:51 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 29 2005 - 05:57:58 PDT