Hi John, > As defined now the pipes are not TLM compliant. Could you explain in detail why they are not compliant? Is it just that they do not follow the TLM style or is it more fundamental than that, e.g., that it is impossible to write a gasket layer that interfaces pipes to TLM? I'd like to understand this better before adding more to SCE-MI 2. > I can have a proposal ready to put on the table next > week for the face-to-face if others are agreeable. I don't mind, but please make sure to add a detailed analysis as to why TLM support must be integral to SCE-MI 2. That is, you must convince me that TLM support could not be implemented as an application layer add-on to SCE-MI 2. Would it be possible to consider TLM support a sub-standard of SCE-MI 2, sort of like a library? Also, if you could outline why TLM support suddenly has become such a hot issue for you. Thanks, Per -- Per Bojsen Email: <bojsen@zaiqtech.com> Zaiq Technologies, Inc. WWW: http://www.zaiqtech.com 78 Dragon Ct. Tel: 781 721 8229 Woburn, MA 01801 Fax: 781 932 7488Received on Tue Jan 31 07:11:06 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jan 31 2006 - 07:11:29 PST