Re: breakthrough solution for "vendor induced" pipes deadlock ?

Per,


Per Bojsen wrote:
> Hi John,
> 
> 
>>I think I might have a breakthrough for our "deadlock"
>>on pipes. :-)
> 
> 
> Thanks for taking the time to think through this and come up
> with a proposal that hopefully will allow us to make some
> progress again.
> 
> One question: are you proposing the new functions as part of
> the official API or are you still suggesting that we define
> the API but make its implementation optional?

johnS:
The latter: Define the API but make implementation optional.
In other words, the user only uses the blocking interface.

-- johnS
<eom>

> 
> Thanks,
> Per
>