RE: feedback SV DPI section of the document - SCEMI 2 chapters 1 & 2

Hi Per,
    In answer to that question, if I had done it right, then the only
difference between the latest version and the last saved version would have
been formatting. So, I saved the original before I did the format changes
and made the reformatted the current. However, I did not want to lose the
original from which it came. I had intended that as soon as the reformatted
version had been through any editing, that I would drop that version from
the histories altogether.

Sorry for the confusion and sorry for having apparently screwed up on the
reformatting process.

Best regards,
Brian

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-itc@server.eda.org [mailto:owner-itc@server.eda.org] On Behalf
Of Per Bojsen
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 8:55 AM
To: itc@server.eda.org
Subject: Re: feedback SV DPI section of the document - SCEMI 2 chapters 1 &
2

Hi Brian and Shabtay,

> _Further more_, I downloaded the SCE-MI 2.0 DPI version you posted on 
> the Web which was supposed to match the version I sent you with correct 
> formatting. However I noted that the version posted blends text that was 
> already deleted with revised text.

I also see what Shabtay is seeing.  I have a question about the document
links on the http://www.eda-stds.org/itc/open/NewDoc/scemi20.htm page.
I assume the link in the Section column always refers to the latest revision
of the document?  The point of confusion is that the SCE-MI 2.0 DPI link
refers to a file with a 060907 suffix which also is the date of the latest
previous revision in the `Previous Dates' column.

Shabtay, did you ever sent out your draft to a wider group or did you
send it only to Brian?  I'd like to take a look at it, but I'd prefer to
look at the `correct' one even if it has track changes enabled.

Per