Hi, I stumbled across a couple of things in the release candidate: 1) Section 5.6.7.2 describes the alternate version of the clock port macro. Shouldn't this section appear in conjunction with the section describing the original clock port macro? 2) Section 5.2.6 talks about SCE-MI 2 support for clock definitions. We should rephrase that as talking about the function based interface or whatever we decided to call the DPI subset. Also, I think we should remove language about the progression of thought and evolution of the standard and just state what it is. 3) Section 4.9.2: I'm quite happy with the content in this section. I must not have read this close enough because this now reads much clearer and describes what I was looking for without the references to SystemC, etc. I would like to see this content be included in the normative part of the standard, i.e., chapter 5. This goes for most of Section 4.9 actually. Per -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Mar 22 09:47:26 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 22 2007 - 09:47:34 PDT