Brian, Looking at the version you just posted on the web, I have noted that you have take the word "candidate" out from the front page and footers. Also, the footer of each page states "SCE-MI 2.0 draft specification - release" but the front page states only SCE-MI "Version 2.0 Release" My questions: Isn't SCE-MI 2.0 draft specification still a release "candidate" until approved by the other Accellera chairs? Shouldn't the font page say also "Version 2.0 Draft release (candidate)"? We only agreed to release SCE-MI 2.0 as a draft. Thanks, Shabtay >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-itc@eda.org [mailto:owner-itc@eda.org] On Behalf Of Brian >Bailey >Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 2:42 PM >To: itc@eda.org >Subject: Released version > >Hi Everyone, > You will have seen my previous email sending the released version to >Johny Srouji for Accellera board approval. I know the attachment will have >bounced, so I am also sending this email which should get through the >reflector properly. The pdf is up on the web site on the front page. At >this >point in time, I have not tidied up the working area, but will get to that >over the next couple of weeks, > >Thanks again everyone!!! >Brian > > > > > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Mar 22 15:00:41 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Mar 22 2007 - 15:00:49 PDT