Minutes of the September 15, 2003 SV-BC Meeting (Design Modeling Committee) 11 58 00 98 00 33 ----a Tom Kiley - Mentor --aaa Matt Maidment - Intel aaaaa Brad Pierce - Synopsis aaa-a Karen Pieper - Synopsis ---aa Johny Srouji - Intel aaaaa Dan Jacobi - Intel aaaaa Dave Rich - Synopsys a-aaa Francoise Martinolle- Cadence -aa-a Jay Lawrence - Cadence aaaa- Dennis Brophy - Mentor a--a- Vassilios Gerousis - Infineon aaa-- Cliff Cummings - Sunburst Design aaa-- Mark Hartoog - Synopsys --a-- Don Mills - LCDM Engineering a---- Doug Warmke - Mentor a---- Rishiyur Nikhil - Bluespec a---- Stu Sutherland - Sutherland HDL Meeting Minutes: ================ Fix the date at the top of the file to be August 18. Dennis moves that we accept these minutes. Danny seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. Review of open Action Items: ---------------------------- ==> Issue # 4: Karen to confirm that SV-CC will take "VCD dumping for all types" SV-CC is not taking the update to the file. No one volunteers to drive it. Karen moves that place issue 4 in the "deferred" category due to lack of a drive for issue 4. Nikhil seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. ==> Karen: update the web to reflect today's changes. Done. ==> Issue # 7: Matt will drive this one. Done. Proposal made. ==> Issue # 14: Dave will drive this one. No update. ==> Issue # 54: Cliff will drive this one. He is currently checking to see if it is a real issue. Proposal made. Issues with Proposals: Issue 7: Dave moves that we accept the proposal. Brad seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. Issue 41: Karen moves that we accept the proposal. Brad seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. Issue 42: Karen moves that we close this issue. Francoise seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. Issue 47: Karen moves that we accept the proposal. Dave seconds. No opposed. Francoise abstains. Passes. Francoise is concerned that the wording may not apply to object class instance. She will open an issue on this. Issue 54: Cliff has a new proposal that is different from the proposal on the web. His new proposal can be found in http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/1060.html We went over his changes. Straw poll: Should ref ports be the default interface behavior? I.E. are you willing to look for an alternative? (no direction? or something else) No: Stu, Nikhil, Cliff, Doug (but alternative is bad), Dennis Yes: Dave, Brad, Karen Issue 61: Danny will send a new proposal. Issue 52: EXT-13 addresses this issue. We'll leave this open until the sv-ec passes the issue. Karen moves that commitments for issues from 3.1 are not required by the end of today. Dave seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. Nikhil's proposal for tagged unions is the delivery of his commitment. Issue 63: Karen moves we accept this change. Nikhil seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. Issue 64: Danny moves we accept this proposal. Brad seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. Issue 67: Doug has an outline of a proposal in issue 67 that we have discussed. $readmem is not defined on multi-dimensional arrays. There were no objections to making this a proposal, so Doug will work something up. Issue 71: Nikhil introduced the idea of tagged unions. New issues discussion: Issue 35: Cliff will drive. Issue 36: Karen to drive. Issue 38: untypedef facility. Who is interested? Karen moves that we close this issue. Namespaces are a better solution. Doug seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. Issue 39: Backward compatability pragmas. Karen moves that we close this issue and pass it on to the 1364. Cliff seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. Issue 44: No volunteers Issue 45: No volunteers Issue 57: Brad to own Issue 58: Karen to own Issue 70: Brad to own ---------------------- Open Action Items for the Next Meeting -------------------------------------- ==> Karen to mark the type parameter mail from Nikhil as an issue. ==> Karen move that place issue 4 in the "deferred" category due to lack of a drive for issue 4. Nikhil seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. ==> Karen: update the web to reflect today's changes. ==> Issue # 14: Dave will drive this one. No update. ==> Francoise is concerned that the wording for issue 47 may not apply to object class instance. She will open an issue on this. Our next meeting is 9/29/03 at 9am Pacific.