Minutes of the March 26, 2004 SV-BC Meeting (Design Modeling Committee) 2 Day 6 0 Month 4 0 Year 4 - Matt Maidment - Intel a Brad Pierce - Synopsys a Karen Pieper - Synopsys a Johny Srouji - Intel - Dan Jacobi - Intel a Dave Rich - Synopsys - Francoise Martinolle- Cadence - Jay Lawrence - Cadence - Dennis Brophy - Mentor a Mark Hartoog - Synopsys a Rishiyur Nikhil - Bluespec a Cliff Cummings - Sunburst Design Review Meeting Minutes Dave moves that we accept the minutes. Nikhil seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. Action Items: ============= Nikhil will update the text to solve the issue with message 1647. Message sent as 1652. Issue 40 created. Dave to propose an errata: It is not clear whether or not the default branch should be taken into consideration in calculating full or parallel case error messaging. Issue was dropped. Karen to post an email indicating that issues people want to open need to start with the title Erata. Done Meeting Minutes: ================ 16: Close as LRM-299. Brad moves. Karen seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. 19: Close as LRM-139. Brad moves. Nikhil seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. 21: Close as LRM-241. Brad moves. Karen seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. 23: Close as LRM-299. Brad moves. Karen seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. 26: Close as LRM-169, LRM-299. Brad moves. Karen seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. 37: Close as LRM-308. Karen moves. Brad seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. 40: Nikhil moves to accept the proposal as stated. Mark seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. 34: Brad moves to accept the proposal as stated. Karen seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. 39: The concensus seems to be that we should add the ability to allow interface declarations inside modules to the BNF. Brad moves that In A.1.5, in non_port_module_item add | interface_declaration Nikhil seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. 1: Karen moves we close 1. Mark seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. 2: Karen moves we close 2. Nikhil seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. 3: Cliff moves that close this issue and we move this to the IEEE. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. 4: Cliff moves that we close this issue with no action. Karen seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. 5: This is a real issue with ambiguity in the language. 6: This is a real issue. 7: Leave open. 8: Cliff moves that we close this issue and we move this to the IEEE. Karen seconds. Brad takes the action to file an errata with 1364. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. 9: Karen moves that we close this issue with no action. Dave seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. 38: Now has a proposal. Dave moves that we accept the proposal. Brad seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. 10: This is an incomplete proposal for an enhancement. Karen moves that we hand it to the IEEE with SV unchanged. Cliff seconds. No opposed. NO abstain Passes. 11: This is an incomplete proposal for an enhancement. Karen maves that we hand it off to the IEEE with SV unchanged. Brad seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. 12: Brad will investigate doing a proposal. 13: DAve will look at this one. 14: This is an incomplete proposal for an enhancement. Karen moves that we hand it off to the IEEE with SV unchanged. Cliff seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. 15: This is an incomplete proposal for an enhancement. Cliff moves that we hand it off to the IEEE with SV unchanged. Karen seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Passes. 17: Leave this open 18: Leave this open 20: Brad to investigate. 22: Leave this open 24: Mark to investigate. 25: Dave to investigate. 27: Brad thinks we should close this. Karen will mark the proposal that we close this. 28: Leave this open. Cliff likes .name. New Action Items: Brad to investigate issue 12 Dave to investigate issue 13 Brad to investigate issue 20 Mark to investigate issue 24 Dave to investigate issue 25 Meeting adjourns. Our next meeting is 05/10/04 at 9am Pacific.