Minutes of the April 25, 2005 SV-BC Ballot Resolution Committee Meeting 221111000 Day 518421641 000000000 Month 444444444 000000000 Year 555555555 aaaaaaaaa Matt Maidment - Intel aaaaaaaaa Brad Pierce - Synopsys aa-aaaaaa Karen Pieper - Synopsys aaaaaaaaa Dave Rich - Mentor Graphics aaa--aaaa Cliff Cummings - Sunburst Design aaaaaa-aa Steven Sharp - Cadence ------aaa Logie Ramachandran - Synopsys aaaaaaaa- Mark Hartoog - Synopsys -aaaaaaaa Gord Vreugdenhil - Mentor Graphics aaaaaaaa- Francoise Martinolle- Cadence -aa-aa-a- Kathy McKinley - Cadence aaaaaa-a- Doug Warmke - Mentor Graphics -aa--aaa- Surrendra Dudani - Synopsys ---a---a- Greg Jaxon - Synopsys -------a- Stuart Sutherland - Sutherland HDL -------a- Dennis Brophy - Mentor Graphics a-------a Don Mills - LCDM Engineering a-------a Dan Jacobi - Intel --------a Rishiyur Nikhil - Bluespec Agenda +Review IEEE patent policy http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-slideset.ppt Reviewed. +Review Previous Meeting Minutes http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/minutes/sv-bc_05_04_21.txt Cliff moves to accept posted minutes. Brad seconds. No opposedl No abstain. Motion passes. +Issue Resolution 202 - Address response for more information: http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/2983.html And comments from Mark & Gord: http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/2984.html http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/2985.html Dave moves to resolve this issue with the following response: "Bind only creates an instance, it does not create a nested module. Clause 18.15 describes bind as creating a module, interface or program instance and makes no mention of nesting modules. Refer to the following thread of the SV-BC email reflector for alternative modeling styles: http://www.eda.org/sv-bc/hm/2983.html" Doug seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Motion passes. 285 (SVDB 691) Dave moves to accept the following response to resolve the issue: "It is correct that you cannot be explicitly specify the data type of the port identifier in such cases. One can achieve the same goal by declaring a port with a parameterized data type and assigning an expression to the port. Using a parameterized data type for the port will enable one to create a unique port type per instance." Brad seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Motion passes. 227 (SVDB 324) Dave moves to accept proposal for issue in SVDB 324 with amendment that task1, task2 not be italicized. Cliff seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Motion passes. 156 (SVDB 505) Steven moves to accept proposal in SVDB 505. Francoise seconds. No opposed. No abstain. Motion passes. Next meeting, Thursday, April 28, 8-10am. Other issues: 93 - Francoise 216 - Matt 275/226 - Brad High Positive 278 (SVDB 618) Update proposal based on outcome of SVDB 304 Negative, No Priority 265 - Stu Possible beyond scope. AI: matt to follow up with Stu. Low Negative 257 - Anyone with a proposal? Is this out of scope? This is seeking to standardize the text formatting of aggregates. Action Items Completed 04/21/05 Brad create Mantis entries for Ballot issues: 216, 275, 285, 286 04/21/05 Brad to enter resolution to 286 in SVDB 04/21/05 Matt create Mantis entries for Ballot issues: 287, 225, 228, 257, 265, 266 Pending 04/04/05 Stu make a specific proposal for Issue 265 no later than April 13 04/11/05 Matt make proposal for 216 04/21/05 Dave drive issue 227 (SVDB99 & SVDB324) 04/21/05 Brad file issue regarding 8.16 language: "operator to each function prototype according to the equivalent argument data types in the overloaded expression, which normally must match exactly." 04/21/05 Matt include 266 in email vote. 04/21/05 Brad to enter resolution of 91 in SVDB 506 04/21/05 Matt send email ballot for ballot issues: 152, 154, 155, 266, 287