Subject: RE: DirectC: C layer - naming convention
From: Warmke, Doug (doug_warmke@mentorg.com)
Date: Tue Jan 14 2003 - 13:04:33 PST
Andrzej,
This proposal sounds fine to me.
I like the idea of staying consistent with VPI.
It doesn't seem like it would be distracting or take
anything away from our DirectC API.
Regards,
Doug
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrzej Litwiniuk [mailto:Andrzej.Litwiniuk@synopsys.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 8:35 AM
> To: sv-cc@server.eda.org
> Subject: DirectC: C layer - naming convention
>
>
> Team,
>
> Joao's document on assertions API specifies the naming convention:
>
> 1. all names will be prefixed by ...
> 2. type name will start with ... followed by Capitalized words
> with no separators, eg vpiAssertCheck
> 3. all function names will start with ... followed by
> all lowercase
> words separated by '_', eg vpi_get_assert_info()
>
> (there is no convention for macros and #defined
> symbolic constants)
>
> Shall we follow similar convention for DirectC C Layer?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrzej
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Jan 14 2003 - 13:05:18 PST