Subject: Re: [sv-cc] My vote on issue 1.9
From: Francoise Martinolle (fm@cadence.com)
Date: Thu Feb 27 2003 - 13:18:00 PST
Yes, this changes it. The final LRM should not mention any switch.
At 07:45 PM 2/27/2003 +0100, Michael Rohleder wrote:
>Francoise,
>
>you might have overlooked this part in the introduction:
>"This section proposes a set of switch names to be used for a particular
>functionality. This is of informative nature; the actual
>naming of switches is not part of this standard. It might further not be
>possible to use certain character configurations in all
>operating systems or shells. Therefore any switch name defined within this
>document is a recommendation how to name a switch, but
>not a requirement of the language."
>This was written immediately before the subsection "Location independence"
>
>Would this solve your objection? Just asking ...
>
>-Michael
>
>Francoise Martinolle wrote:
>
> > I vote yes for part 1 shared library inclusion with the objection to
> > specify in the standard
> > the names of the switch for the simulator.
> >
> > I vote no for part 2 source code inclusion.
> >
> > I will send specific detailed comments later.
> >
> > Thanks Michael for putting this together.
> > Francoise
> > '
> > At 04:45 AM 2/27/2003 +0000, Swapnajit Mittra wrote:
> >
> > >Francoise,
> > >
> > >The poll is on whether we accept Michael's
> > >proposal (Part 1 and 2) for inclusion in the
> > >SV-CC LRM.
> > >
> > >As far as I know Michael did not send any
> > >update since I sent the poll announcement
> > >(Michael, please correct me if I am wrong).
> > >
> > >Considering the lateness of this reply,
> > >I will wait till my noon time tomorrow
> > >before announcing the result of the poll.
> > >You may send your comment separately
> > >for Part 1 and 2 (as some already did).
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >- Swapnajit.
> > >
> > >Francoise wrote:
> > >
> > >I am a little bit confused on what we are voting.
> > >Previous votes refer to different things.
> > >Swanajit,
> > >
> > >
> > >can you rephrase the things we are voting on clearly. and send the
> > >latest updated documents from Michael on which we need to vote on.
> > >thanks
> > >
> > >
> > >Francoise
> > > '
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >Swapnajit Mittra
> > >Project VeriPage ::: http://www.angelfire.com/ca/verilog
> > >
> > >
> > >________________________________________________________________
> > >Sign Up for Juno Platinum Internet Access Today
> > >Only $9.95 per month!
> > >Visit www.juno.com
>
>--
>
>NOTE: The content of this message may contain personal views
> which are not neccessarily the views of Motorola, unless
> specifically stated.
>
> ___________________________________________________
> | |
> _ | Michael Rohleder Tel: +49-89-92103-259 | _
> / )| Software Technologist Fax: +49-89-92103-680 |( \
> / / | Motorola, Semiconductor Products, System Design | \ \
> _( (_ | _ Schatzbogen 7, D-81829 Munich, Germany _ | _) )_
> (((\ \>|_/ > < \_|</ /)))
> (\\\\ \_/ / mailto:Michael.Rohleder@motorola.com \ \_/ ////)
> \ /_______________________________________________\ /
> \ _/ \_ /
> / / \ \
>
>The information contained in this email has been classified as:
>Motorola General Business Information (x)
>Motorola Internal Use Only ( )
>Motorola Confidential Proprietary ( )
>
>
>*** This note may contain Motorola Confidential Proprietary or
> Motorola Internal Use Only Information and is intended to be
> reviewed by only the individual or organization named above.
> If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative
> of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
> dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any,
> or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received
> this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
> return email and delete this email from your system.
> Thank you! ***
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Feb 27 2003 - 13:19:02 PST