Francoise and I met and have agreed that there is no
conflict between Issues 122 and 80.
I have submitted a rewrite of 122 with some wording
changes that Francoise suggested.
Francoise will write up a specific proposal for Issue
80.
Regards,
Jim Vellenga
--------------------------------------------------------- 
James H. Vellenga                            978-262-6381 
Engineering Director                   (FAX) 978-262-6636 
Cadence Design Systems, Inc.         vellenga@cadence.com 
270 Billerica Rd 
Chelmsford, MA 01824-4179 
"We all work with partial information." 
---------------------------------------------------------- 
  
 
] -----Original Message-----
] From: owner-sv-cc@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-cc@eda.org] On 
] Behalf Of Charlie Dawson
] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 5:32 PM
] To: Steven Dovich; SV-CC; sachip@synopsys.com; 
] asaha@synopsys.com; ksp@synopsys.com; KCAMERON@altera.com; 
] r53776@motorola.com; Shalom.Bresticker@freescale.com; 
] Michael.Rohleder@freescale.com; R.Slater@freescale.com
] Subject: [sv-cc] SV-CC Meeting minutes for 09/22/2004
] 
] 
] 
] Minutes of 09/22/04 SV-CC Meeting.
] ATTENDEES
] 000
] 444
] 000
] 999
] 211
] 250
] xxx Ghassan Khoory
] xxx Francoise Martinolle
] xxx Doug Warmke
] xxx Bassam Tabbara
] xxx Andrzej Litwiniuk
] xxx Joao Geada
] xxx Charles Dawson
] xxx Jim Vallega
] xx- Ralph Duncan
] x-- Rob Slater
] x-- Sachchidananda Patel
] x-- Michael Rohleder
] x-- John Stickley
] -x- Jim Garnett
] -x- Steven Dovich
] --x Swapnajit Mitra
] --x Karen Pieper
] 
] 1.  Reviewed Patent information.
] 
]    - Charles Dawson read the patent information.
] 
] 
] 2.  Reviewed minutes of the 9/15/04 Meeting.
] 
]    - Joao moves that we accept the minutes.
]      Ralph seconds.  No opposed.  No abstentions  Passed.
] 
] 
] 3.  Liaisons
] 
]    - Chas reported on the PTF activities.  PTF will be working
]      on errata for 1364 going forward, as directed by 1800.
]      They are also interested in two large changes:
]       - deprecating the PLI 1.0 sections
]       - converting diagrams to UML
]      The second item generated some discussion on whether we
]      wanted to do the same for the systemVerilog VPI sections.
]      Joao expressed concern about the printability of the
]      diagrams generated by Rational Rose.  Francoise reported
]      that Peter Ashenden had resolved the printing issue for
]      VHPI.  Francoise took an action to find out what was done
]      for VHPI.  JimV questioned whether the IEEE would allow
]      vendors to ship the UML, or would the vendors need to
]      pay royalties.  Francoise to research.
] 
] 
] 4.  New business
] 
]    - Francoise questioned how we would interact with the database,
]      and what the values for the different fields meant.  After
]      a lengthy discussion, Chas took an action to ask Karen to:
] 
]      - write up a process from initial entry of an issue to final
]        resolution, detailing the various states that a issue can
]        be in and how to transition from one to another.
] 
]      In the mean time, we decided that proposals should be added
]      as a separate bugnote that begins with a "Proposal:" line.
] 
]    - Chas noted that due to the agenda being sent out too late, we
]      would not be able to vote on any items but could do straw
]      polls.  The process that we will follow, as adopted at our
]      last meeting, is there has been insufficient notification of
]      a vote we will take a straw poll.  If prior to the next
]      meeting someone objects, then the issue will be reopened.
]      Otherwise, the straw poll will become an official vote
]      at the next meeting.  Chas also noted that he will be trying
]      to publish the minutes in plenty of time for the next meeting
]      and the minutes will include a list of items that have complete
]      proposals.  This will allow us to vote on them at the next
]      meeting.
] 
]    - Item 162: Wrong outline of task func in VPI Instance diagram
] 
]      Chas noted that "task func" should also be italicized.  JimV
]      agreed.  Straw Poll:  Accepted as amended. (No objections)
] 
]    - Item 124: Inconsistent VPI names: var(iable) drivers and loads
] 
]      Discussed.  Straw Poll:  Accepted as proposed (No objections)
] 
]    - Item 123: Clarify meaning of "member typespec" in VPI
] 
]      Discussed.  Joao was concerned that this proposal may conflict
]      with potential solutions for item #80.  Francoise and JimV
]      were not sure about that.  During the course of discussion, JimV
]      noticed several problems with his proposal.  JimV took an action
]      to fix the problems and submit a new proposal.
] 
]    - Item 122: Eliminate property vpiTypedefType as redundant
] 
]      Discussed.  Joao was concerned this may conflict with potential
]      solutions for item #80.  Francoise and JimV took an action to
]      work on #122 and #80 together to come up with a cohesive solution
]      to both issues.
] 
] 
] 5.  Old Business
] 
]    - Chas to see if everyone can be set to developer for accessing
]      the database.
] 
]      Chas now has an account setup, but has not had a chance to
]      play with it much yet.
] 
]    - Everyone to send the set of items to which they have already
]      made proposals.
] 
]      Chas received lists from Francoise, JimV, Ralph and Doug.
] 
] 
] Meeting ended at 1:05pm (EDT)
] 
] 6.  Action items
] 
]    - Chas to see if everyone can be set to developer for accessing
]      the database.
]    - Everyone to send the set of items that they will be working on.
]    - Everyone to send the set of items to which they have already
]      made proposals.
]    - Chas to get the database updated to reflect the 8/11 meeting.
]    - Chas to make sure everyone is on the SV-CC email list.
]    - Francoise to ask Peter Ashenden what was done to improve
]      printing from Rational Rose.
]    - Francoise to inquire about the feasibility of third parties
]      shipping the UML for the diagrams.
]    - Chas to ask Karen to write up the process for resolving any
]      given database item.
]    - JimV to resubmit a proposal for Item 123.
]    - JimV and Francoise to work on a cohesive solution for Item 122
]      and Item 80.
] 
] 7.  Items for consideration at the next meeting (they already have
]      proposals):
] 
]    - Item 077: VPI diagram for instances shouldn't refer to 
] reg objects
]    - Item 205: Clarify size relationship of packed type 
] canonical/vendor formats.
]    - Item 202: Fix 1 erroneous cross-ref, 1 grammar error.
]    - Item 160: Multiple packed dimensions (agree on 
] interpretation), fix cross-ref & text.
]    - Item 049: Decide on semantics: require import fn return 
] value data type, add sentence.
]    - Item 048: Fix obsolete text on imported task return type.
]    - Item 047: Fix 3 erroneous cross-references.
]    - Item 046: Fix 1 typo and 1 grammar error.
]    - Item 156: Jeita 31: In Index, issue with blocking and DPI imports
]    - Item 198: Add unions to list of supported unpacked 
] aggregate types for DPI arguments
]    - Item 199: More detail needed for DPI treatment of 
] dynamic array arguments
]    - Item 200: Clarifications needed in DPI Annex E.6, "Data Types"
]    - Item 201: More details needed on DPI string argument handling
]    - Item 123: Clarify meaning of "member typespec" in VPI
] 
] 
] -- 
] Charles Dawson
] Senior Engineering Manager
] NC-Verilog Team
] Cadence Design Systems, Inc.
] 270 Billerica Road
] Chelmsford, MA  01824
] (978) 262 - 6273
] chas@cadence.com
] 
] 
] 
] 
] 
] 
] 
Received on Wed Sep 22 14:57:59 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Sep 22 2004 - 14:58:02 PDT