I'm confused. Is there a resolution to the question about the 1-1 transition
from gen scope to gen var? Chas added a new proposal, but that was only a 
proposal. I don't see from the minutes a resolution of that proposal.
Shalom
>    - Item 313 PTF 296: Generate stmts will need change made in VPI
>      - Friendly amendment to memory to reg array and add a vpiMemory label.
>        JimV/Francoise.  PASSED as amended (unanimous)
>      - Does SystemVerilog handle generates?
>        We should add gen scope array to the module diagram in systemVerilog
>        as well as the interface and program diagrams.  We should add gen scope
>        to the scope class in systemVerilog.  We should open a new item to change
>        the systemVerilog stuff.
>        Francoise and Chas to investigate what to do for systemVerilog and generates.
>    - Chas et all, to look into the 1 to 1 transition from gen scope to gen var
>      in 1364.  Should it be a 1 to many transition?
>      Chas added a new proposal. Done.
-- Shalom Bresticker Shalom.Bresticker @freescale.com Design & Verification Methodology Tel: +972 9 9522268 Freescale Semiconductor Israel, Ltd. Fax: +972 9 9522890 POB 2208, Herzlia 46120, ISRAEL Cell: +972 50 5441478 [ ]Freescale Internal Use Only [ ]Freescale Confidential ProprietaryReceived on Wed Jan 26 12:12:28 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 26 2005 - 12:12:36 PST