[sv-cc] Re: [sv-bc] RE: [sv-ec] Fw: Clarification of Entity-based participating/voting rules.

Karen -
Is even *attendance* limited to members? I thought that previously, non-members
could join the calls and speak, but not vote.

I spent a lot of (company-paid) time developing the compact modeling extensions
to Verilog-AMS for "the good of the industry"; my company is not interested in
paying $000s so that I can have the privilege of contributing my time.

-Geoffrey

Bresticker, Shalom wrote:
> I can see why people were riled up about this. What happened to IEEE's
> famous "openness"?
> We did not have as much participation as we would have liked even last time.
> Now we will have much less...
>
> Shalom
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* owner-sv-ec@eda.org [mailto:owner-sv-ec@eda.org] *On Behalf
> Of *Karen Pieper
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 03, 2010 12:19 AM
> *To:* IEEE 1800; SV-BC eda.org; sv-ec; SV-CC; SV-AC eda.org
> *Subject:* [sv-ec] Fw: Clarification of Entity-based
> participating/voting rules.
>
> Hi, all,
>
> The following email from the Chair of the DASC, our sponsor,
> indicates that once the WG and sv-* groups start functioning, we
> will need to limit attendance, and voting rights and privileges, to
> employees/representatives of SA member entities. Please encourage
> your entities to become members.
>
> Karen
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From*: owner-stds-dasc@eda.org <owner-stds-dasc@eda.org>
> *To*: stds-dasc@eda.org <stds-dasc@eda.org>
> *Sent*: Tue Mar 02 13:32:24 2010
> *Subject*: Clarification of Entity-based participating/voting riles.
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> As most of you now may know, the IEEE Standards Association (SA) has
> established a new two-tiered membership structure. This new
> structure is outlined here:
> http://standards.ieee.org/sa-mem/corp_overview.html. The upshot of
> this new policy is that for all Entity-based IEEE WGs (including, of
> course, all DASC Entity-based WGs) only representations of Advanced
> SA member Entities may make motions, vote and so forth.
> Representatives from Entities with Basic SA membership may only
> attend meetings as an observer, but there is no limit to the numbers
> of meetings at which they may hold such an observer status.
> Representatives of non-SA member Entities may only attend a single
> meeting of a WG as an observer.
>
>
>
> There was some question whether these rules applied to only the
> “highest level” of a particular WG. Could, for example, a
> particular Entity-based WG establish a task force that had looser
> attendance/voting rules? The answer from the IEEE is ‘no’.
> Specifically, I was told wrt Entity-based (Aka “Corporate-based”)
> WGs: “Corporate membership rules apply to all WG activities and
> that includes any subcommittees, task forces, etc. formed by the WG.”
>
>
>
> Stan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>,
> and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Intel Israel (74) Limited
>
> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
> the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
> by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and is
> believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.