Date: Wed Jan 26 2011 - 23:39:58 PST
Stan,
"Yes".
Comment: As a result of prototyping work, we have become aware of a few minor technical changes that are needed to the wording of the LRM, but these can be taken care of as we move forward.
-- John A -----owner-systemc-p1666@eda.org wrote: ----- To: "'systemc-p1666@eda.org'" <systemc-p1666@eda.org> From: Stan Krolikoski Sent by: owner-systemc-p1666@eda.org Date: 01/20/2011 09:19PM Subject: P1666 WG vote on draft LRM Hi, The P1666-2011 SystemC LRM is now available for final WG vote. It can be found at http://www.eda.org/twiki/pub/P1666/WebHome/P1666-2011_Jan_20_11.pdf and http://www.eda.org/twiki/pub/P1666/WebHome/P1666-2011_Jan_20_11_with_labels.pdf The two versions are identical, except that the second version indicates the nature of each new item, e.g., whether it is a change, correction, addition or a clarification. Under IEEE rules, only the designated representative of those Corporate members of the Standards Association, who have signed up for this WG, may cast an official vote on this LRM. The “entities”, who may vote are: Accellera Cadence Freescale Intel JEITA Mentor NXP OSCI ST Micro STARC Synopsys TI However, there have been multiple other people representing various organizations, who have participated in the P1666 work that took place during 2010. To bring this process to completeness, I welcome votes/comments from those individuals even though their votes will not officially count in the “black and white” vote tally. However, I am hoping that the votes of the “official voters” plus those of the “observers” will form a sort of “SystemC community consensus” around the new standard that has been developed. I would ask that each entity, whether an official member of the P1666 WG or not, cast a single vote. The voting period will extend from the time I send out this email on January 20th, through 5 PM PST on January 28. Please vote in one of the following categories: Yes (with optional comments) No (with mandatory comments) Abstain (with optional comments) Note that you must give a reason for a negative vote. Comments may also accompany positive votes or abstentions to point out issues to be considered, even if the issues do not engender a negative vote. To help me keep track of the votes, please vote as a reply to this email. You have the option of doing a “reply” (keeping your vote secret) or “reply all” making your vote public. Stan Stan Krolikoski | Group Director, Standards, Strategic Alliances P: 1.408.944.7260 M: 1.925.336.9343 www.cadence.com -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
