Re: sc_port, sc_export binding overload and base classes

Hi David,

On 3/3/2010 2:44 PM, david.long@doulos.com wrote:
> The bind operator takes a templated port argument (rather than using
> sc_port_base) because the port
> is used to access the interface methods which are not present in the
> generic sc_port_base class
Indeed. And anyway, the content of sc_port_base is implementation-defined.

But... this is not my proposal.

> so I
> don't think this proposal is realistic either.
Maybe you misunderstood me, just have a look at one SystemC
implementation and class sc_port_b.

Best regards,

Jerome

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.