WG Status

Folks,

The soft deadline for enhancement requests has now passed. I have
catalogued 11 enhancement requests and about 60 errors/ambiguities. On the
face of it, I think they are all "reasonable" requests, but of course each
must be debated by the WG.

I propose we start by tackling the bigger issues, and keep a few
concurrent discussion threads going. Let's continue with TLM-1 and with
issues around processes and events, since that discussion has kicked off
already.

Re. TLM-1 I have made a tentative proposal. Stuart and Jerome are
generally supportive, and there have been no negative comments. We have
refined the spec to keep the namespace tlm for backward compatibility and
to add two new namespaces tlm1 and tlm2. Can I take it that we have a
consensus to go ahead and implement this proposal (it can still be tweaked
as we go along). Any objections?

Re. the process id / operator< issue, could I please have some more solid
proposals?

Also, let's try to reach a conclusion re. event and/or lists and named
events.

Thanks,

John A

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.