reset_signal_is variations

From: <john.aynsley@doulos.com>
Date: Thu Jul 15 2010 - 09:25:36 PDT

systemc-2.3.10dec09_beta has the following methods in class sc_module

    void reset_signal_is( const sc_in<bool>& , bool );
    void reset_signal_is( const sc_inout<bool>& , bool );
    void reset_signal_is( const sc_out<bool>& , bool );
    void reset_signal_is( const sc_signal_in_if<bool>& , bool );

    void async_reset_signal_is( const sc_in<bool>& , bool );
    void async_reset_signal_is( const sc_inout<bool>& , bool );
    void async_reset_signal_is( const sc_out<bool>& , bool );
    void async_reset_signal_is( const sc_signal_in_if<bool>& , bool );

whereas class sc_spawn_options only contains the following subset:

    void reset_signal_is( const sc_signal_in_if<bool>& , bool );
    void reset_signal_is( const sc_in<bool>& , bool );

    void async_reset_signal_is( const sc_signal_in_if<bool>& , bool );
    void async_reset_signal_is( const sc_in<bool>& , bool )

Do we want to extend sc_spawn_options to include the methods for sc_out
and sc_inout?

Thanks,

John A

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Jul 15 09:26:03 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 15 2010 - 09:26:06 PDT