Re: reset_signal_is variations

Kaz, All,

If I understood Philipp correctly, he was proposing we support
reset_signal_is for multiports. Here is Philipp's proposal

"Regarding multi-ports for all variants, it would be enough to have

template< typename N >
void reset_signal_is( const sc_port<sc_signal_in_if<bool>,N>& port
                    , bool level );
template< typename N >
void reset_signal_is( const sc_port<sc_signal_inout_if<bool>,N>& port
                    , bool level );

since sc_out<> is also derived from the generic inout port, right?
An implementation of course could still drop the templates internally. "

What does everyone think?

John A

From:
Kaz Yoshinaga <yoshi@starc.or.jp>
To:
john.aynsley@doulos.com
Cc:
systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org
Date:
20/07/2010 00:53
Subject:
Re: reset_signal_is variations

Yes, sc_spawn_options should be extended.

By the way, regarding the signal interface of reset_signal_is and
async_reset_signal_is, don't they need to include inout interface as
Philipp proposed?

ie.
     void reset_signal_is( const sc_signal_inout_if<bool>& , bool );

Regards,

-- 
Kaz Yoshinaga
(2010/07/16 1:25), john.aynsley@doulos.com wrote:
> systemc-2.3.10dec09_beta  has the following methods in class sc_module
>
>     void reset_signal_is( const sc_in<bool>& , bool );
>     void reset_signal_is( const sc_inout<bool>& , bool );
>     void reset_signal_is( const sc_out<bool>& , bool );
>     void reset_signal_is( const sc_signal_in_if<bool>& , bool );
>
>     void async_reset_signal_is( const sc_in<bool>& , bool );
>     void async_reset_signal_is( const sc_inout<bool>& , bool );
>     void async_reset_signal_is( const sc_out<bool>& , bool );
>     void async_reset_signal_is( const sc_signal_in_if<bool>& , bool );
>
> whereas class sc_spawn_options only contains the following subset:
>
>     void reset_signal_is( const sc_signal_in_if<bool>& , bool );
>     void reset_signal_is( const sc_in<bool>& , bool );
>
>     void async_reset_signal_is( const sc_signal_in_if<bool>& , bool );
>     void async_reset_signal_is( const sc_in<bool>& , bool )
>
> Do we want to extend sc_spawn_options to include the methods for 
> sc_out and sc_inout?
>
> Thanks,
>
> John A
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by *MailScanner* <http://www.mailscanner.info/>, and 
is
> believed to be clean. 
-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.