Priorities for the coming months

Folks,

At the last P1666 telecon we agreed that in the coming months we will
focus on closing the priority issues as identified during our telecon of
27-May-2010. Specifically, we agreed that we would address the issues
categorized as "Positive" or "Positive with some disagreement".

For clarity, I list these issues below, together with the name of the
person who raised the issue:

(A) Cadence: Process Control Extensions
(B) Jerome, ST: Version number macros
(C) Dave Long, Doulos: Representing the maximum value of sc_time
(D) Tor, TI: sc_event_and_list / sc_event_or_list
(E) Jerome, ST: Change to sc_port class structure so bind can be
overloaded
(F) John, Doulos / Bishnupriya, Cadence: Review the status of having
multiple processes write to the same sc_signal
(G) Philipp, Offis: Add a container class for array-of-port etc
(H) Tor, TI: Add an sc_pause function. Also add an sc_get_status function
(J) David Black, Xtreme: Make request_update thread-safe
(K) Jerome, ST / Bisnupriya, Cadence: Naming sc_events

If your name appears in the list above, please be prepared to step forward
and champion your proposal when the time comes.

You can review the details here:
http://www.eda.org/twiki/pub/P1666/WebHome/P1666_poll_results_May_27.pdf

The intent is not to exclude other issues altogether, just to move them to
the back of the queue for consideration later if we have time.

Thanks,

John A

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.