RE: make "errors" be "warnings" in process control spec

From: <john.aynsley@doulos.com>
Date: Thu Sep 16 2010 - 10:41:18 PDT

Bishnupriya, All,

I feel very unsettled about the idea of allowing any process control
extensions to be executed from the update phase, which is clearly intended
for the update of primitive channels. In particular, allowing reset() to
switch in and execute a process function from the beginning feels like it
should be forbidden except from the evaluation phase.

Opinions?

John A

From:
Bishnupriya Bhattacharya <bpriya@cadence.com>
To:
"john.aynsley@doulos.com" <john.aynsley@doulos.com>
Cc:
SystemC P1666 Technical <systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org>
Date:
14/09/2010 10:20
Subject:
RE: make "errors" be "warnings" in process control spec

John,
 
For the sixth point, yes, this is specially true for throw_it(). For the
other constructs, there will be some effect if they are issued from phase
callbacks or from a module's ctor, and so they are allowed. As for calling
from update phase, it is also allowed for the other constructs, although I
do not feel strongly on this point.
 
Thanks,
-Bishnupriya

From: john.aynsley@doulos.com [mailto:john.aynsley@doulos.com]
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 6:59 PM
To: Bishnupriya Bhattacharya
Cc: SystemC P1666 Technical
Subject: Re: make "errors" be "warnings" in process control spec

Bishnupriya,

I have already caught the first 5 points.

Regarding the 6th point, does this only apply to throw_it? Are there
similar constraints on calling other process control methods from phase
callbacks or from the update phase?

John A

From:
Bishnupriya Bhattacharya <bpriya@cadence.com>
To:
"john.aynsley@doulos.com" <john.aynsley@doulos.com>, SystemC P1666
Technical <systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org>
Date:
08/09/2010 12:36
Subject:
make "errors" be "warnings" in process control spec

John,
  
I reviewed all the places in the current spec where it says something
"shall be an error". For all of these, I feet it will be fine (and
probably better) to say "shall generate a warning". Some of these have
already been discussed in the reflector and it has been concluded that
these should be made warnings instead of errors.
  
I include the full list below.
  
Thanks,
-Bishnupriya
 
  
- "sync_reset_on() shall only be applicable to thread processes, it shall
be an error to invoke sync_reset_on() on a method process"
- "It shall be an error to specify reset_signal_is() for a method process"

- "throwing an exception in a terminated process shall be an error if the
include_descendants flag is not set"
- "Throwing an exception in a process that has not started execution yet
shall have no effect for the same reasons as above, and shall be an error"

- "Throwing an exception when simulation is not running (before simulation
start or after simulation end) shall have no effect and shall be an error"

- "The thrower shall always be a process. It shall be an error to throw an
exception from any other context, for example from a phase callback or
from the update() routine of a user defined channel"
 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Bishnupriya Bhattacharya | R&D - SystemC Simulation, Debug &
Analysis | Cadence
    P: +91.80.4184.1197 www.cadence.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Sep 16 10:41:49 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 16 2010 - 10:41:52 PDT