TLM-2.0 compliance

All

Back along we started a discussion on whether P1666 should make any
statements concerning TLM-2.0 compliance. The protogonists were Stuart,
Hiroshi Imai, and myself. We reached the conclusion that we wanted to
define three terms explicitly in the 1666 LRM:

Informally,

"A TLM-2.0 compliant implementation" = An implementation that implements
everything in the 1666 LRM including the TLM-2.0 interoperability layer
and the TLM-2.0 utilities

"TLM-2.0 base protocol compliant" = An application that obeys all the
rules of the base protocol as spelled out in the 1666 LRM

"TLM-2.0 custom protocol compliant" = An application that uses the
standard initiator and target sockets specialized with a user-defined
protocol traits class, but is not obliged to obey any of the base protocol
rules (though recommended to follow the rules of the base protocol as far
as possible)

Does this group wish to continue this discussion and add such term to the
LRM?

Thanks,

John A

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.