namespace tlm

All,

A while back we discussed introducing two new namespaces, tlm1 and tlm2, but observed that in order to keep backward compatibility we would have to retain the namespace tlm incorporating names from both namespaces.

Given the existence of substantial amounts of legacy code for both TLM-1 and TLM-2.0, all of which uses namespace tlm, I am wondering about the wisdom of introducing two new namespaces at this point. Does it really buy us anything? Will users really want to bothered with distinguishing between tlm1:: and tlm2:: ?

What does everyone think?

Thanks,

John A

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.