I agree with Philipp.
Making 
  wait( empty_list );
behave like 
  wait();
just seems wrong to me. I think it should throw an exception.
Dave
From:
"Philipp A. Hartmann" <philipp.hartmann@offis.de>
To:
john.aynsley@doulos.com
Cc:
systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org
Date:
01/11/2010 23:29
Subject:
Re: Empty events lists
Sent by:
owner-systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org
John,
On 01/11/10 23:26, john.aynsley@doulos.com wrote:
> 
> We have not explicitly discussed the semantics of empty event lists, 
e.g.
I vaguely remember, that you (or someone else?) suggested forbidding
this corner case some time back.
> sc_event_or_list list;
> assert( list.size() == 0 );
> wait( list );
> 
> I propose that "If the event list object is empty, the effect shall be
> the same as omitting the event list argument from the call."
Especially for the "list-only" wait() case, I don't really like this.
The user intended to dynamically wait on an (unfortunately empty) list,
why should the process suddenly be triggered by its static sensitivity?
Consider the following:
  SC_THREAD(...)
    sensitive << ev1;
  // ...
  sc_event_or_list list1, list2 = ev1 | ev2;
  // never triggered by ev2, but why?!
  wait( list1 );
I think, such a bug (list1 instead of list2) might be a pain to track
down, especially in more complex situations.  So I would prefer to at
least require a warning in case of an empty list.
  For the timeout variants, ignoring empty lists might not be that much
of a problem, since at least the process is never triggered by an
"unrelated" event.  For consistency reasons, we might want to issue a
warning as well, though.
Greetings from Oldenburg,
  Philipp
> In other words, in the example above,
> 
>   wait( list );
> 
> shall be equivalent to
> 
>   wait();
> 
> and
> 
>   wait(10, SC_NS, list);
> 
> shall be equivalent to
> 
>   wait(10, SC_NS);
> 
> Is that acceptable?
> 
> John A
> 
> 
> 
-- Philipp A. Hartmann Hardware/Software Design Methodology Group OFFIS Institute for Information Technology R&D Division Transportation · FuE-Bereich Verkehr Escherweg 2 · 26121 Oldenburg · Germany Phone/Fax: +49-441-9722-420/282 · PGP: 0x9161A5C0 · http://www.offis.de/ -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Tue Nov 2 02:24:52 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 02 2010 - 02:24:58 PDT