Re: Multiple writers to sc_signal

From: David C Black <dcblack@xtreme-eda.com>
Date: Thu Nov 11 2010 - 04:07:56 PST

I like it.

On Nov 11, 2010, at 5:43 AM, alan.fitch@doulos.com wrote:

> Would it make sense to include the word "signal" in the names, just to avoid any confusion? E.g.
> SC_SIGNAL_ONE_WRITER
> SC_SIGNAL_MULTIPLE_WRITERS
> sc_signal_writer_policy
>
> I have no strong opinion, I just imagine new users thinking they can do multiple writes to some other primitive channel.
>
> regards
> Alan

------------------------------------------------------
David C Black, XtremeEDA ESL Practice Leader
http://www.Xtreme-EDA.com
(Consulting, Services & Training for all your ESL, verification and DFT needs)
Voice: 512.850.4322 Skype: dcblack FAX: 888.467.4609

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Received on Thu Nov 11 04:08:24 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Nov 11 2010 - 04:08:25 PST