Dynamic events

Bishnupriya,

Re. dynamic events, you said in your original spec:

"To address this performance concern, the behavior of sc_event's default
ctor after simulation start is kept unspecified, i.e.
implementation-defined. An implementation may choose to treat such events
exactly the same as static events, or it can choose to not name them at
all, or somewhere in between."

In what sense to we want to allow "somewhere in between"? It would be fine
to have some events named and others unnamed, but would we want an event
that had a parent but no hierarchical name, or a hierarchical name and no
parent? This would seem like an unnecessary complication to me. I would
rather have each event either named or unnamed, where only named events
have a parent, and no orphan has a name.

John A

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.