SC_NOBASE

All,

SC_NOBASE is mentionion the the LRM as an enumeration literal within type sc_numrep, but its behavior is not defined anyway. In the OSCI sim at behaves like SC_DEC.

Should we document SC_NOBASE in the LRM? As = SC_DEC? As implementation-defined? Something else?

Thanks,

John A

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.