Re: Data pointer with TLM_IGNORE_COMMAND

All votes were in favor, so I declare this issue closed.

John A

-----David C Black <dcblack@xtreme-eda.com> wrote: -----
To: john.aynsley@doulos.com
From: David C Black <dcblack@xtreme-eda.com>
Date: 12/06/2010 06:51PM
Cc: jerome.cornet@st.com, systemc-p1666-technical@eda.org, bartv@synopsys.com
Subject: Re: Data pointer with TLM_IGNORE_COMMAND

yes

On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 12:45 PM, <john.aynsley@doulos.com> wrote:
  All,

Personally, I accept Jerome's argument that allowing the GP data pointer to be null when the command is TLM_IGNORE_COMMAND would make more sense and would not cause any serious backward compatibility problems. A similar relaxation of the rules would apply to the GP data length attribute: we would allow it to be 0.  (Jerome has already given a detailed analysis on the reflector, which I will not repeat here.)
  
Do people agree? Votes please.

Thanks,

John A

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
  

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.