SC_IGNORE_VERBOSITY

Alan,

See Bishupriya's comment below. Perhaps I've misunderstood, but I thought the intent of SC_IGNORE_VERBOSITY was to allow applications to extend the enumeration, and was unrelated to having an optional argument?

Thanks,

John A

-----Bishnupriya Bhattacharya <bpriya@cadence.com> wrote: -----
To: "john.aynsley@doulos.com" <john.aynsley@doulos.com>
From: Bishnupriya Bhattacharya <bpriya@cadence.com>
Date: 12/07/2010 05:41PM
Cc: Bishnupriya Bhattacharya <bpriya@cadence.com>
Subject: RE: Verbosity Control

    
John,
 
I'm fine with content below, with the following comments:
 
1) The enum SC_IGNORE_VERBOSITY = 9999 was proposed by Alan for the case where we have only one report() signature with an optional verbosity argument at the end. We are not going with that signature. Philip had also not liked this enum. So I don't think we need this enum. 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.