From: john.aynsley@doulos.com [mailto:john.aynsley@doulos.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 10:01 PM
To: Philipp A. Hartmann
Cc: john.aynsley@doulos.com; Stuart Swan; Bart Vanthournout; Jerome CORNET; stanleyk@cadence.com; P1666 Technical WG
Subject: Re: TLM extensions - status
>>Good point. The new init would be obliged to reset the flag, which could be done in the mem mgr, but it is not v robust. An >>extension would be safer, or Erics proposal...
Sorry, I think I missed the point. A new initiator will have to reset the flag (but this is not as big deal, it must
do something to benefit the extra feature); an old initiator will not have to reset anything, and its payloads
will have the default value for the attribute.
What am I missing?
Jerome
-- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.Received on Thu Dec 9 03:39:42 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Dec 09 2010 - 03:39:46 PST