RE: [tlmwg] Revisit of the TLM2.0 phases rules

> And since we have temporal decoupling at AT, in-order with respect to
> timing
> would mean to have PEQs everywhere, and that would render the whole
> idea
> of temporal decoupling meaningless (but I confess that I always
> wondered if
> temporal decoupling at AT is really useful...).

In my experience, you cannot really combine temporal decoupling to any useful extent with trying to model a shared blocking interconnect. The biggest interval you can use is something smaller than the minimal blocking time, and even anything bigger than one might cause unfairness in which requestors get access to the resource.

/jakob

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.